Merriam-Webster's 2025 Word of the Year was "AI slop." That should tell you everything about where the culture is headed.
People can tell. Not always, not perfectly, but the instinct is sharpening. And when they find out you hid it, the trust hit is worse than if you'd just said so from the start.
So let me say it clearly: AI helps me create content. This blog included.
The ideas are mine. The experience is mine. The opinions, the conviction, the story behind every piece of content Dirt Digital puts out. That's me. The research assistance, the drafting support, the fact-finding at 2am when I'm deep in a rabbit hole about content distribution. That's AI.
I'm proud of that.
The Hiding Game
Here's what's happening across the industry right now. Brands are using AI to generate content, images, entire campaigns. And most of them are doing everything they can to make it look human. To sand off the edges. To never mention the machine in the room.
The numbers tell the story:
- 93% of consumers say it's important to understand how digital content they consume was created or edited (Adobe)
- 77% of people want to know if content was created by AI, in whole or in part (Baringa)
- McDonald's Netherlands pulled an AI-generated Christmas ad after viewers called it "AI slop"
- California's AI Transparency Act takes effect August 2, 2026, delayed from January 2026 by AB 853 amendments
- Meta rolled out mandatory AI disclosure for advertising in March 2026
- YouTube is cracking down on mass-produced AI content and requires disclosure for realistic synthetic media
The audience is asking for honesty. Most brands are giving them performance.
The Paradox Nobody Wants to Talk About
Here's the uncomfortable truth the research surfaces: disclosing AI involvement actually reduces trust in the short term. Studies show a measurable "trust penalty" when people know content was AI-assisted. Engagement drops. Skepticism rises.
So why would you disclose?
Because the alternative is worse. Getting caught hiding it doesn't just cost you a trust penalty. It costs you credibility. Permanently.
This is the same math that applies to every form of honesty in business:
- Transparency = short-term cost, long-term compounding return
- Hiding = short-term gain, catastrophic downside
We're taking the long side of that trade.
What "Proudly AI" Actually Means
It doesn't mean everything we produce is AI-generated. It doesn't mean we're replacing human creativity with prompts. It means we're honest about our tools.
I write letters to my grandmother every month. By hand. I love writing. The creative process, the thinking, the way putting words on paper forces clarity. That part of me hasn't changed.
What has changed is my willingness to spend three hours researching a technical topic I want to share with people, formatting it, fact-checking it, and polishing it for publication. That work matters, but it's not where the value lives. The value lives in:
- The experience
- The perspective
- The opinion
- The part that only comes from doing the work in the real world
AI handles the scaffolding. I handle the signal.
If you've ever used any of these, you've used AI assistance:
- Spell check
- Grammarly
- Google's search suggestions
- A calculator
- Photoshop's auto-adjust
The line between "tool" and "AI" is blurrier than the discourse pretends. We just crossed a threshold where the tools got good enough to scare people.
Why This Matters for What We're Building
Dirt Digital is a growth agency. We use AI agents to operate faster, produce more, and deliver for clients at a level that would otherwise require a team three times our size. That's not a secret. That's the pitch.
Our clients are technology and blockchain companies. They get it. They're not hiring us despite the AI. They're hiring us because of how we use it.
But we also know that not everyone is there yet. Some people reading this will be skeptical. Some will think AI content is inherently lesser. That's okay. You're entitled to that opinion.
Here's what I'd ask: judge the output, not the process.
- If a blog post helps you think about something differently, does it matter whether the author used a typewriter or a terminal?
- If a growth strategy delivers pipeline, does it matter whether the research was compiled by a human or an agent?
The content I don't want to write (the technical breakdowns, the tool comparisons, the detailed how-tos) still has value. It can still help people. The fact that I used AI to help create it shouldn't deter me from putting it into the world. And it shouldn't deter you from reading it.
The Bet We're Making
We think the brands that win the next five years will be the ones that were honest from the start. Not the ones with the best AI. Not the ones with the most sophisticated hiding strategies. The ones that said, "Here's how we work, here's what we made, here's the human behind it."
Only 21% of people trusted AI companies in 2023, rising to just 31% by 2025 (Gallup). That number isn't going up by hiding more. It goes up by building a track record of honesty. One piece of content at a time.
We're techno-optimists. We believe in decentralization. But we're not confined to labels. This isn't about ideology. It's about choosing to operate with rigor and a moral compass in an industry that's moving faster than the rules.
If you've got integrity and you aim to provide value and not cheat people, there's space for you. That's true whether you're:
- Using AI or not
- Building a startup or writing a blog
- Running a growth agency from Thailand
Proudly AI isn't a tagline. It's a standard.
AI does the digging. You close the deal. And you tell the truth about how the hole got dug.
Follow the journey: X | LinkedIn | YouTube
Building a tech or blockchain company? See what AI-powered growth looks like.